[Paper-club sessions] Large Concept Models: Language Modeling in a Sentence Representation Space

In the rapidly evolving field of artificial intelligence, Large Language Models (LLMs) have become the dominant approach for natural language processing tasks. However, they typically operate at the token level, which doesn't mirror how humans process information at multiple levels of abstraction. In the paper "Large Concept Models: Language Modeling in a Sentence Representation Space" [1], researchers from FAIR at Meta introduce a novel architecture that operates on an explicit higher-level semantic representation they call a "concept." This approach moves beyond token-level processing to model language at the sentence level, leveraging the SONAR embedding space that supports up to 200 languages in both text and speech modalities.

‍

‍

Current state-of-the-art LLMs like Llama, Mistral, Bloom, Gemini, GPT, and Claude all share a similar underlying architecture: they're transformer-based, decoder-only language models pre-trained to predict the next token given a long context of preceding tokens. Despite their impressive capabilities, these models miss a crucial characteristic of human intelligence: explicit reasoning and planning at multiple levels of abstraction. Humans typically process information hierarchically, starting with a high-level structure before adding details. Additionally, current LLMs face challenges with long contexts due to the quadratic complexity of transformer attention, and they require substantial data and engineering efforts to support multiple languages and modalities.

‍

Figure 1: Left: visualization of reasoning in an embedding space of concepts (task of summarization). Right: fundamental architecture of a Large Concept Model (LCM). [1]

‍

The Large Concept Model (LCM) addresses these limitations through a fundamentally different approach. As shown in FIGURE 1, the input is first segmented into sentences, each encoded with SONAR to create a sequence of concept embeddings. This sequence is then processed by the LCM to generate new concept embeddings, which are finally decoded into output text. The researchers explored multiple architectures, including direct MSE regression (Base-LCM), diffusion-based approaches (One-Tower and Two-Tower LCM), and quantization-based models (Quant-LCM). The key advantage of this approach is that the LCM operates in a language and modality-agnostic space, enabling it to reason at a purely semantic level without being tied to any specific language. Moreover, the same sequence of concepts can be decoded into different languages without repeating the reasoning process.

‍

Figure 2: Rouge-L scores on XLSum for multilingual performance [1].

‍

Experimental results demonstrate the potential of this approach. The researchers initially tested different LCM variants with 1.6B parameters before scaling the most promising architecture to 7B parameters. The models were evaluated on several generative tasks, including summarization and a new task called summary expansion. FIGURE 2 showcases one of the most impressive results: the LCM's zero-shot generalization to many languages, where it outperforms Llama-3.1-8B-IT on English and achieves strong performance across numerous low-resource languages like Pashto, Burmese, and Hausa without any language-specific training. Additionally, FIGURE 3 illustrates how LCM's inference efficiency scales better than traditional LLMs as context length increases, due to operating on sequences that are at least an order of magnitude shorter.

‍

Figure 3: Theoretical inference efficiency of LCMs compared to LLMs. Only extremely short sentences (≤10 tokens) favor LLMs. [1]

This work represents a significant step toward more versatile, efficient, and multilingual AI systems. While the current implementations may not yet match the performance of specialized models in all tasks, the LCM architecture demonstrates promising capabilities, particularly in zero-shot generalization across languages and handling long documents. The researchers have open-sourced their training code to foster further exploration in this direction. Future work could focus on developing more optimized embedding spaces specifically designed for concept modeling, extending the approach to additional modalities, and exploring higher levels of abstraction beyond sentences. As the field continues to evolve, Large Concept Models offer an intriguing alternative path to the current token-based paradigm.

‍

Final remarks

In my view, the paper represents a bold and innovative step in rethinking language models. By shifting from token-level generation to a sentence-level, concept-driven approach, it opens the door to more efficient and potentially more human-like reasoning. The idea of operating in a shared semantic space not only improves multilingual generalization but also hints at better long-context handling. 

However, there are clear trade-offs: generating text via intermediate embeddings can sometimes compromise fluency and detail, and the choice of using a sentence as the fundamental “concept” might oversimplify complex ideas. 

Overall, while the approach is promising and could inspire a new class of hierarchical, multimodal models, further refinement and broader evaluations are necessary before it can be seen as a complete alternative to current token-based models.

‍

Here are some open questions worth exploring:

• Optimal Concept Granularity:
  Is treating each sentence as a single “concept” the best approach? Might it be more effective to use finer (clauses) or coarser (paragraphs) units—or even a dynamic segmentation strategy that adapts to the content?
  
  
• Hybrid Architectures:
  Would combining concept-level reasoning with token-level refinement provide the best of both worlds—capturing high-level planning while preserving detailed fluency and accuracy?
  
  
• Multimodal and Multilingual Extensions:
  How well can a concept-driven approach generalize to other modalities (like images or audio) or work across even more languages? What modifications might be needed to handle such diversity effectively?

‍

References:

[1] Barrault, L., Duquenne, P. A., Elbayad, M., Kozhevnikov, A., Alastruey, B., Andrews, P., ... & Schwenk, H. (2024). Large Concept Models: Language Modeling in a Sentence Representation Space. arXiv e-prints, arXiv-2412. Available at: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.08821

‍